Role of Institutional Ownership Mechanism under the Effect of Price-to-Earnings Ratio on the Performance and Efficiency of Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange

Document Type: Original Research

Author

PhD Student in Accounting, Qeshm Campus, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran

Abstract

In capital markets, corporate governance mechanisms are used as valuation criteria in dynamic markets to assess corporate value. The mechanisms concentrating on ownership structures, regulatory processes, and auditing try to improve corporate performance and to create value for stakeholders. The present research studied the effect of institutional ownership as ownership structure mechanism under price-to-earnings ratio on the performance and efficiency of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange in 92 sample companies over an 8-year period within 2006-2013. Analysis of research hypotheses show that there is no significant difference between abnormal return of companies with small and large institutional ownership, and low-, intermediate-, and high price-to-earnings ratios. Evaluation of research models over three regression models indicates that institutional ownership for companies with low price-to-earnings ratio has no effect on performance through assessed normal return, abnormal return, and net profit. Further, assessing three other regression models demonstrates that institutional ownership in companies with high price-to-earnings ratio also showed no effect on performance through normal return, abnormal return, and assessed net profit.

Keywords


Abaszde, S., Jabarzade kangarluei, S., and Mokhtari, B. (2012). Comparative studying of the difference between ownership structure and cost of capital in capital and leverage companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Regional conference of innovative issues in Accounting.
Adeyemi, S. and Fagbemi, T., (2010). “Audit Quality, Corporate Governance and Firm Characteristics in Nigeria”, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5, No. 5: 169-179.
Aghaei, M.A., Etemadi, H., Azar, A., and Chalaki, P. (2009). Characteristics of corporate governance and earning information content in Tehran Stock Exchange focused on earning management contribution. Iranian journal of management sciences (IAMS), 4 (16).
Agrawal A., Knoeber C. R. (2008), "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3): 377–397.
Ahmadpuor, A., and Kashanipuor, M., and Shojaei, M.R. (2010). Studying the effect of corporate governance and auditing quality on finance cost through debt. Studies of accounting and auditing, 17 (62).
Ameer. R. (2012), Impact of Cash Holdings and Ownership Concentration on Firm Valuation, Review of Accounting and Finance Vol. 11 No. 4, 2012 pp. 448-467.
Anderson, C. R, Mansi, A. Sattar, Reeb, M. David(2003). Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 68, 263-285.
Andrew, B. Jackson., Michael, M., Peter, Roebuck. (2008), “Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 23, No.5, pp.420-437.
Asta, S. (2011). Studying the relationship between ownership structure and earning management. Financial accounting studies, 3 (2), serial number 8, summer; pp. 93-106.
Azibi, J., Tondeur, H. and Rajhi, M., (2010). “Auditor choice and institutional investor characteristics after the Enron scandal in the French context”, Crises et nouvelles problématiques de la Valeur, Nice: France.
Banerjee, A., Gokarn, S., and Pattanayak, M. (2009). Corporate Governance and Market Value: Preliminary Evidence from Indian Companies. Standard and Poor’s Financial Services LLC. PP1-10.
Chambers D, Payne J. Audit Quality and Accrual Reability: Evidence from the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley Priods. Working Paper 2008; Available at SSRN: http://ssrn. Com/ abstract =1136787
Chang, J., and Sun, C. (2008). The Relation between Earning Information, Earnings Management and Corporate Governance in the Pre – and post – Sox Periods. Working Paper. SSRN.
Davidson R.A. and D. Neu, A Note on Association between Audit Firm Size and Auditor Quality, Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(2), 1993, 479-488.
Davidson, R,A. and D, Neu. (1993), “A note on association between audit firm size and audit quality”, contemporary accounting research, Vol. 9, pp 479-488.
Davis, RL. Soo, B.S. and Trompeter, G. M., (2009) "Auditor tenure and ability to meet or beat earnings forecasts", Contemporary Accounting Research, No 26 , pp517-548.
DeAngelo LE. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting & Economics 1981; 3: 183
DeAngelo, L. (1981), "Auditor size and audit quality", Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3 No.3, pp.183-99.
Demsetz, H. & Villalonga, B.(2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 209-233.
Dittmar, A., J. Mahrt-Smith, and H. Servaes, (2007). International Corporate Governance and Corporate Cash Holdings, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 111–133.
Etemadi, H., Babajani, J., Azar, A., and Diyanati deylami, Z. (2009). Studying the effect of organizational culture, ownership concentration, and ownership structure on information quality of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Iranian journal of management sciences (IAMS), 15 (4), fall; pp. 59-85.
Gorton, w., Mark Fox,. And Kocurek, K (2002), “corporate governance reform in East Asia”, Corporate Governance, Vol 2, No 1, p: 4-9
Gundavelli,V, (2006). ”7 Steps to Elevating Working Capital Performance”, Financial Executive, Vol. 22,No.4,pp.5254
Hanifezade, L. (2010). Ownership structure and efficiency of insurance companies in Iran. Journal of insurance industry, 25 (2); serial number 98; pp. 139-164.
Hasas yegane, Y. (2004). Corporate governance and its effect on reporting. Conference of financial reporting, Institute of Certified Accountants.
Hasas yegane, Y., Moradi, M., and Eskandar, H. (2007). Studying the relationship between institutional investors and corporate value. Journal of accounting and auditing review, 32.
Ibrahimi, Kordlar, and Arabi, M.J. (2010). Ownership concentration and earning quality in companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of financial accounting studies, 2 (2), serial number (4); pp. 95-110.
Izadiniya, N., and Rasaeiyan, A. (2010). Corporate governance means, cash flow maintenance, and corporate performance of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Economic policies and studies, 18 (55), fall; pp. 141-155.
Jensen M.C. and W.H. Mcling, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 1976, 305-360.
Karimzade, M., Nourozi, M., and Nam, M. (2013). Studying the effect of finance and shareholders’ concentration on market reaction of Tehran Stock Exchange to corporate reporting earnings. Journal of monetary and financial economics. New edition, 20 (5), summer and spring; pp. 115-134.
Khaki, Gh.R. (2005). Management methodology. Baztab publication.
Krishhan, J. and aldhayezr, J. (1987), “Litigation Risk and Auditor Resignations”, The Accounting Review, Vol 72 No. 4, pp. 539-560.
Krishnan, G., Schauer, P. (2001), "Differences in quality among audit firms", Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 192 No.1, pp.85.
Mansourfar, K. (2006). Statistical methods. Fifth edition, University of Tehran publication.
Mashayekh, Sh., and Mahavarpour, M. (2008). Studying the effect of ownership concentration on corporate performance of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Experimental studies of financial accounting, 23, fall; 107-122.
Mat Nor, F., and Sulong, Z. (2010). Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm Valuation in Malaysian Listed Firms. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing Vol.6, No.1 , PP 18-36.
Mohammadi, Sh. (2010). The effects of ownership structure focused on concentration and composition on corporate performance and returns of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. M.A. thesis, faculty of management, University of Tehran.
Mohammadi, Sh., Ghalibaf asl, H., and Meshki, M. (2009). Studying the effect of ownership structure on corporate returns and value in companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial studies, 11 (28).
Myers S.(1986). "The Capital Structure Puzzle". Journal of Finance, PP:575-592.
Myers, J., Myers, A. and Omer, T. (2003), “Exploring the Term of the Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation?”, The Accounting Review, Vol 78 No. 3, pp. 779-800.
Namazi, M., and Kermani, E. (2008). The effect of ownership structure on corporate performance of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of accounting and auditing review, 35.
Palmerose, Z. (1988), “An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality”, the accounting review, Vol. 64, pp. 55-73.
Rastgarniya, F., and Abasi, I. (2012). The effect of ownership structure on corporate value of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of experimental accounting studies, 2 (1); serial number 5; pp. 33-50.
Rezaee, z. (2007) corporate governance post–Sarbanes-Oxley, john wiley & sons, London.
Ross .stephen A,Rondolph W.Westerfield, Jeffry Jaffe ,2005,Corporate finance, ,seventh edition, MC.Graw Hill.
Sadeghi sharif, S.J., and Kafash panje shahi, M. (2009). The effect of shareholders composition on corporate returns of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of accounting and auditing review, 3 (55); spring; pp. 51-66.
Schauer, P. (2001), “The Effects of Industry Specialization on Audit Quality: An Examination using Bid- Ask Spreads”, Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, Vol 10 No. 1, pp.76-86.
Schilder A., Audit Quality an IAASB Perspective, www.iaasb.org, 2011
Shu, S. (2000), “Auditor Resignations: Clientele Effects and Legal Liability”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 29 No. 2, pp. 173-205.
Titman, S. and B, Trueman. (1986), “information quality and the valuation of new issues”, journal of accounting and economics, Vol. 8, pp 159-172.
Tsaia, H. and Z. Gu (2007). "The Relationship Between Institutional Ownership and Casino Firm Performance." Hospitality Management. Vol. 26, pp. 517-530.