Principles verses Rules-Based Accounting Standards’ Application in Fiji: An Overview of the Literature

Document Type: Original Research

Authors

Department of Accounting & Finance, The University of Fiji, Saweni, Lautoka, Fiji

Abstract

The emerging economies differ significantly in terms of the size, structure, capabilities of the accounting institutes and regulatory bodies. The difference in the organizational culture in the emerging economies to that of a developed economy raises several concerns about the application of the principle - based accounting standards fostered by International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Culturally, the professional accountants in Fiji prefer to adhere to rule as opposed to principle - based standards that requires exercise of significant judgment. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to elaborate on the strength and weaknesses of the rule and principle - based accounting standards and will specifically focus on the applicability of each type of the standards in the context of a less developed country – Fiji.

Keywords


Bagranoff, N.A., Houghton, K.A.,&Hronsky, J. (1994). The structure of Meaning in Accounting: a Cross-Cultural Experiment. Behavioural Research in Accounting 6 (Suppl.), 35 - 57.
Ball.R., Robin, A.,& Wu, J.S. (2003). Incentives Versus Standards: properties of Accounting Income in Four East Asian Countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36,235 -270.
Benston, G., Bromwich, M.,&Wagenhofer, A. (2006). Principles -Versus  Rules- Based Accounting Standards: The FASB’s Standard Setting Strategy. Abacus42 (2), 165 - 188.
Chambers, R. J., &Wolnizer.P, (1991). A True and Fair View of Position and Results: The Historical Background. Accounting, Business and Financial History, 1 (2), 197- 213.
Chand, P. (2005). Impetus to the success of harmonization: the case of South Pacific Island Nations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting,16(3), 209-26.
Chand, P., &White, M. (2003). Accountability of the Private Sector to the People of Fiji: regulation through global pressure and interest. Pacific Islands Governance Portal Digital Library, Conference papers 27. http://www.rkb.usp.ac.fj/gsdl/collect/diggov_old/index/ assoc/HASH01f5.dir/doc.pdf
Chand, P., &White, M. (2006).The Influence of Culture on Judgments of Accountants in Fiji.Australian Accounting Review, 16 (3), 82 -88.
Chand, P., &White, M. (2007).A Critique of the Influence of Globalization and Convergence of Accounting Standards in Fiji.Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18 (5), 605 - 622.
Chand, P., Patel, C., &Patel.A.(2005). Judgments of Professional Accountants in Fiji: Implications for Convergence of Accounting Standards. Segun Wallace Best Paper Award at the 2005 Emerging Issues in Accounting, Business and Technologies Conference, Niagara Falls, New York; 04–06 August.
Davie, S.S. K. (2000). Accounting for Imperialism; A case of British-imposed Indigenous Collaboration.Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal,l13 (3), 330 - 359.
Dickey, J., &Scanlon, M. (2006). “Principles based” Accounting Standards - an accident waiting to happen? Insights; the Corporate & Securities Law Advisor. Englewood Cliffs 20 (2).
Doupnik, T. S., &Richter, M (2003). Interpretation of Uncertainty Expressions: A Cross-National Study. Accounting, Organizations and Society,28, 15 - 35.
Earley, C.E. (2001). Knowledge Acquisition in Auditing: Training Novice Auditors to Recognize Cue Relationships in Real Estate Valuation. The Accounting Review,76 (1), 81 - 97.
FASB. (2007). Conceptual Framework Project  2007. Project Update.FASB/IASB.http://www. fasb.org/project/conceptual_framework.shtml#objective
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences, Sage Publications.
Holmes, S., &Marsden, S. (1996).An Exploration of the Espoused organizational Cultures of Public Accounting Firms.Accounting Horizons, 10, 26 - 53.
Hopwood, A.J. (2000). Understanding financial accounting practice.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(8), 763 - 6.
ICAS.(2006).Principles not Rules: A question of Judgment. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland, Edinburgh. http://www.icas.org.uk/site/cms/download/rs_ Principles_v_Rules.pdf
Ijiri, Y. (2005).US accounting standards and their environment: A dualistic study of their 75-year transition. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 24 (4), 255 - 279.
Lin, K.Z., Fraser, I.A.M., &Hatherly, D.J. (2003). Auditor Analytical Review Judgement: A Performance Evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 35, 19 - 34.
Manson, S., McCartney, S., Sherer, M., &Wallace, W.A. (1998). Audit Automation in the UK and the US: A Comparison Study. International Journal of Auditing, 2, 233 - 246.
Nelson, M., Elliott, J., &Tarpley, R. (2002).  Evidence from Auditors about Managers' and Auditors’ Earnings Management Decisions.Accounting Review (Suppl.), 77 (4).
Nobes, C. W. (1998). Towards a General Model of the Reasons for International Differences in Financial Reporting.Abacus, 34 (2), 162 - 87.
Psaros, J., &Trotman ,K. T. (2004). The Impact of the Type of Accounting Standards on Preparers’ Judgements.Abacus, 40 (1), 76–93.
Schipper, K. (2003). Principles based accounting standards. Accounting Horizons, 17 (1),  61 – 72.
Vera-Munoz., S.C., Kinney.,W. R. &Bonner., S.E. (2001). The Effects of Domain Experience and Task Presentation Format on Accountants’ Information Relevance Assurance.The Accounting Review,76 (3), 405–429.